A multi-national financial firm in a highly regulated environment depended heavily on its compliance team of 13 lawyers to guide them through all aspects of the project completion cycle, and that team had become dysfunctional. The team lead “Barbara” called 5 Dynamics® because her group had splintered into a we/they mindset. Located four time zones apart, some teammates had stopped speaking and collaborating. She had made open communication a major emphasis and couldn’t understand why her group wasn’t improving. Barbara had heard from the company’s executive team that 5 Dynamics® could catalyze rapid changes in group performance and wanted to learn more.
5 Dynamics®
developed a three-part strategy: measure / meet / follow up. First, the
teammates anonymously completed our team assessment, measuring the
group’s view of its performance in terms of factors critical to their
success. The lowest scores emerged in the areas of trust, external
recognition, and leadership effectiveness. A subset of average scores
appears below:
One
team member who had not spoken with Barbara in six months immediately
asked to collaborate with her on mutual coaching. Barbara called the
session “very constructive” and requested to continue working with 5 Dynamics®
to sustain the progress the team made. The two “groups” now consider
themselves one team, and collaborate productively throughout the project
completion cycle together despite (or perhaps because of) their
differences. 5 Dynamics®
was next invited to work in the general counsel’s office.
It was fascinating to me, to become more aware of my work preferences (the assessment was spot-on), and it was interesting to see my colleagues in a new light. [The] enthusiasm and insights made it all very fun but also on a more serious note I am sure the discussions will help us start to communicate and work together more productively as a team.
— Executive Director